Presentation Server vulnerabilitiesRanked by how likely they are to be used.
Presentation Server is made by Citrix. We track 7 published vulnerabilities listed under that exact name, across 2 versions. None of them is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. Citrix lists newer releases under their own names, such as Presentation Server Client, so check those pages too.
We keep watching the known-exploited list.
Is Presentation Server listed under other names? Yes.
Citrix also lists Presentation Server under more specific names, such as Presentation Server Client. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. If you run one of these, open its page for its own exploited flaws.
Which Presentation Server vulnerabilities are being exploited?
This is the list that matters most: flaws criminals are using now.
None of Presentation Server's published vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today. We keep watching that list.
Which Presentation Server flaws are most likely to be used?
Ranked by the latest exploit-likelihood forecast: the chance each flaw is used in an attack in the next 30 days. A high severity score on its own doesn't tell you that. Flaws shared by many other makers' products are left out.
- 1.4%CVE-2009-2453High
Citrix XenApp (formerly Presentation Server) 4.5 Hotfix Rollup Pack 3 does not apply an access policy when it is defined with the Access Gateway Advanced Edition filters, which allows attackers to bypass intended...
- 1.3%CVE-2006-3779Medium
Citrix MetaFrame up to XP 1.0 Feature 1, except when running on Windows Server 2003, installs a registry key with an insecure ACL, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges.
- 0.7%CVE-2002-2426Medium
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Citrix Presentation Server 4.0 and 4.5, MetaFrame Presentation Server 3.0, and Access Essentials 1.0 through 2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary...
- 0.3%
The installation process for Citrix Presentation Server 4.5 and Desktop Server 1.0, when MSI logging is enabled, stores database credentials in MSI log files, which allows local users to obtain these credentials by...
- 0.3%CVE-2008-4676Medium
Unspecified vulnerability in Citrix XenApp (formerly Presentation Server) 4.5 Feature Pack 1 and earlier, Presentation Server 4.0, and Access Essentials 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 allows local users to gain privileges via...
Running Presentation Server? We'll keep checking.
Looking flaws up one at a time doesn't scale. Tell us what you run once, and we tell you which flaws matter to you, in what order, and keep watching for new ones.
- Tell us what you runPick your software from a list, or let us work it out from your website.
- We match it to every flawOver 400,000 published flaws, checked against your list.
- Ranked by real-world riskA 0 to 100 score, led by evidence criminals are using it.
- Told as soon as we knowAn alert by email, in the app or by webhook to your own tools.
Free plan, no card needed. Nothing to install.
1 new flaw affects software Acme tracks
Buffer overflow in the Independent Management Architecture (IMA) service in Citrix Presentation Server (MetaFrame Presentation Server) 4.5 and earlier, Access Essentials 2.0 and earlier, and Desktop Server 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an invalid size value in a packet to TCP port 2512 or 2513.
- Matched to
- Presentation Server on Acme's software list
- What to do
- Plan in the vendor’s update
Sent to the alert recipients Acme chose. Also in the app and to Acme's webhook.
We track 7 published vulnerabilities listed under the name Presentation Server, across 2 versions.
None of Presentation Server's vulnerabilities is on the list of flaws known to be exploited today.
Citrix also lists Presentation Server under more specific names, such as Presentation Server Client. Flaws listed only under those names are counted on their own pages, not here. Open the release you run to see its own list.
Create a EdgeProtect account and track Presentation Server. We match it against every published flaw, give each one a risk score from 0 to 100 and keep watching, so you hear about new ones as soon as we know, by email, in the app or by webhook.