[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fk4hhV3Uq_cEQooiXYPocZHY5BnzmRv_cKtCaf8AtPvk":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2024-54676":114},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":111},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":34,"epssPercentile":27,"epssTimeSeries":35,"severity":36,"affectedProducts":37,"affectedProductsCount":43,"references":44,"referencesCount":55,"weaknesses":56,"weaknessesCount":43,"isActivelyExploited":65,"cisaInfo":27,"otxData":27,"relatedBlogPosts":66,"seoMetadata":67,"configurations":92,"relatedVendorCves":102,"notableEvents":103},"CVE-2024-54676","What is CVE-2024-54676?","Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation\n\nVersions Affected: Apache OpenMeetings from 2.1.0 before 8.0.0\n\nDescription: Default clustering instructions at  https:\u002F\u002Fopenmeetings.apache.org\u002FClustering.html  doesn't specify white\u002Fblack lists for OpenJPA this leads to possible deserialisation of untrusted data.\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 8.0.0 and update their startup scripts to include the relevant 'openjpa.serialization.class.blacklist' and 'openjpa.serialization.class.whitelist' configurations as shown in the documentation.","Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Apache OpenMeetings from 2.1.0 before 8.0.0 Description: Default clustering instructions at https:\u002F...","2025-01-08T09:15:07.44","2025-01-15T15:50:39.987",9.8,"CVSS:3.1\u002FAV:N\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:N\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:H\u002FI:H\u002FA:H",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":27,"CVSSMetricV2":27,"CVSSMetricV40":27},[16,30],{"Source":17,"Type":18,"CVSSData":19,"ExploitabilityScore":28,"ImpactScore":29},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":20,"VectorString":13,"AttackVector":21,"AttackComplexity":22,"PrivilegesRequired":23,"UserInteraction":23,"Scope":24,"ConfidentialityImpact":25,"IntegrityImpact":25,"AvailabilityImpact":25,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":26,"ExploitCodeMaturity":27,"RemediationLevel":27,"ReportConfidence":27,"TemporalScore":27,"TemporalSeverity":27,"ConfidentialityRequirement":27,"IntegrityRequirement":27,"AvailabilityRequirement":25,"ModifiedAttackVector":27,"ModifiedAttackComplexity":27,"ModifiedPrivilegesRequired":27,"ModifiedUserInteraction":27,"ModifiedScope":27,"ModifiedConfidentialityImpact":27,"ModifiedIntegrityImpact":27,"ModifiedAvailabilityImpact":27,"EnvironmentalScore":27,"EnvironmentalSeverity":27},"3.1","NETWORK","LOW","NONE","UNCHANGED","HIGH","CRITICAL",null,3.9,5.9,{"Source":31,"Type":32,"CVSSData":33,"ExploitabilityScore":28,"ImpactScore":29},"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","Secondary",{"Version":20,"VectorString":13,"AttackVector":21,"AttackComplexity":22,"PrivilegesRequired":23,"UserInteraction":23,"Scope":24,"ConfidentialityImpact":25,"IntegrityImpact":25,"AvailabilityImpact":25,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":26,"ExploitCodeMaturity":27,"RemediationLevel":27,"ReportConfidence":27,"TemporalScore":27,"TemporalSeverity":27,"ConfidentialityRequirement":27,"IntegrityRequirement":27,"AvailabilityRequirement":25,"ModifiedAttackVector":27,"ModifiedAttackComplexity":27,"ModifiedPrivilegesRequired":27,"ModifiedUserInteraction":27,"ModifiedScope":27,"ModifiedConfidentialityImpact":27,"ModifiedIntegrityImpact":27,"ModifiedAvailabilityImpact":27,"EnvironmentalScore":27,"EnvironmentalSeverity":27},0.68777,[34,34,34,34,34,34,34],"Critical",[38],{"vendor":39,"product":40,"version":41,"criteria":42,"vulnerable":4},"apache","openmeetings","*","cpe:2.3:a:apache:openmeetings:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",1,[45,50],{"url":46,"source":47,"tags":48},"https:\u002F\u002Flists.apache.org\u002Fthread\u002Fo0k05jxrt5tp4nm45lj14yfjxmg67m95","Apache",[49],"Vendor Advisory",{"url":51,"source":52,"tags":53},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.openwall.com\u002Flists\u002Foss-security\u002F2025\u002F01\u002F08\u002F1","Openwall",[54],"Mailing List",2,[57],{"id":58,"name":59,"description":60,"extendedDescription":61,"status":62,"abstraction":63,"structure":64},"CWE-502","Deserialization of Untrusted Data","The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently verifying that the resulting data will be valid.","It is often convenient to serialize objects for communication or to save them for later use. However, deserialized data or code can often be modified without using the provided accessor functions if it does not use cryptography to protect itself. Furthermore, any cryptography would still be client-side security -- which is a dangerous security assumption.\nData that is untrusted can not be trusted to be well-formed.\nWhen developers place no restrictions on \"gadget chains,\" or series of instances and method invocations that can self-execute during the deserialization process (i.e., before the object is returned to the caller), it is sometimes possible for attackers to leverage them to perform unauthorized actions, like generating a shell.","Draft","Base","Simple",false,[],{"title":68,"metaDescription":69,"keywords":70,"canonicalUrl":71,"structuredData":72},"What is CVE-2024-54676? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | EdgeProtect","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2024-54676, a critical severity cyber security vulnerability from 2025. High exploit probability (68.8%). Vendor: The Apache So...","CVE-2024-54676, CVE-2024-54676 vulnerability, CVE-2024-54676 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2025, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, apache security, openmeetings vulnerability, high risk vulnerability, actively exploited, exploit available","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2024-54676",{"@context":73,"@type":74,"headline":68,"description":69,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":75,"publisher":79,"about":83,"mainEntityOfPage":87,"articleSection":90,"keywords":91},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":76,"name":77,"url":78},"Organization","EdgeProtect","https:\u002F\u002Fedgeprotect.io",{"@type":76,"name":77,"url":78,"logo":80},{"@type":81,"url":82},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fedgeprotect.io\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Fedgeprotect-logo-512.png",{"@type":84,"name":6,"description":85,"additionalType":86},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":88,"@id":89},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fedgeprotect.io\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2024-54676","Cybersecurity","CVE-2024-54676, CVE-2024-54676 vulnerability, CVE-2024-54676 security, critical severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[93],{"Operator":27,"Negate":27,"Nodes":94},[95],{"Operator":96,"Negate":27,"CPEMatch":97},"OR",[98],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":42,"MatchCriteriaID":99,"VersionStartExcluding":27,"VersionStartIncluding":100,"VersionEndExcluding":101,"VersionEndIncluding":27},"E83A3409-D9F1-4F24-AC6A-D97C68AC2344","2.1","8.0.0",[],[104],{"id":105,"eventType":106,"eventTime":107,"details":108,"label":109,"color":110},"16d066d5-73da-4d5a-a25e-ab0f0f92bffe","HIGH_EPSS_DELTA","2026-06-16T04:04:31.232515+00:00","Daily EPSS score increased by 0.576 on 2025-01-10","EPSS Score Increased","red",{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":112,"version":113},1793229536197,"2.0",{"score":115,"band":116,"action":117,"scoredAt":118},63,"Medium","Plan remediation","2026-10-28T07:05:42.826341+00:00"]