[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fsveihYi0gOfRzu4LgpeasL16vPRcUSBT8L2a5Y4sKh0":3,"g5a-risk:CVE-2017-17382":183},{"success":4,"data":5,"meta":181},true,{"cveId":6,"title":7,"description":8,"shortDescription":9,"publishedDate":10,"lastModified":11,"cvssScore":12,"cvssVector":13,"cvssMetrics":14,"epssScore":38,"epssPercentile":15,"epssTimeSeries":39,"severity":40,"affectedProducts":41,"affectedProductsCount":65,"references":66,"referencesCount":101,"weaknesses":102,"weaknessesCount":111,"isActivelyExploited":112,"cisaInfo":15,"otxData":15,"relatedBlogPosts":113,"seoMetadata":114,"configurations":139,"relatedVendorCves":165,"notableEvents":166},"CVE-2017-17382","What is CVE-2017-17382?","Citrix NetScaler Application Delivery Controller (ADC) and NetScaler Gateway 10.5 before build 67.13, 11.0 before build 71.22, 11.1 before build 56.19, and 12.0 before build 53.22 might allow remote attackers to decrypt TLS ciphertext data by leveraging a Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle, aka a ROBOT attack.","Citrix NetScaler Application Delivery Controller (ADC) and NetScaler Gateway 10.5 before build 67.13, 11.0 before build 71.22, 11.1 before build 56.19, and 1...","2017-12-13T16:29:00.253","2025-04-20T01:37:25.86",5.9,"CVSS:3.0\u002FAV:N\u002FAC:H\u002FPR:N\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:H\u002FI:N\u002FA:N",{"CVSSMetricV31":15,"CVSSMetricV30":16,"CVSSMetricV2":29,"CVSSMetricV40":15},null,[17],{"Source":18,"Type":19,"CVSSData":20,"ExploitabilityScore":27,"ImpactScore":28},"nvd@nist.gov","Primary",{"Version":21,"VectorString":13,"AttackVector":22,"AttackComplexity":23,"PrivilegesRequired":24,"UserInteraction":24,"Scope":25,"ConfidentialityImpact":23,"IntegrityImpact":24,"AvailabilityImpact":24,"BaseScore":12,"BaseSeverity":26,"ExploitCodeMaturity":15,"RemediationLevel":15,"ReportConfidence":15,"TemporalScore":15,"TemporalSeverity":15,"ConfidentialityRequirement":15,"IntegrityRequirement":15,"AvailabilityRequirement":15,"ModifiedAttackVector":15,"ModifiedAttackComplexity":15,"ModifiedPrivilegesRequired":15,"ModifiedUserInteraction":15,"ModifiedScope":15,"ModifiedConfidentialityImpact":15,"ModifiedIntegrityImpact":15,"ModifiedAvailabilityImpact":15,"EnvironmentalScore":15,"EnvironmentalSeverity":15},"3.0","NETWORK","HIGH","NONE","UNCHANGED","MEDIUM",2.2,3.6,[30],{"Source":18,"Type":19,"CVSSData":31,"BaseSeverity":26,"ExploitabilityScore":36,"ImpactScore":37,"ACInsufInfo":15,"ObtainAllPrivilege":15,"ObtainUserPrivilege":15,"ObtainOtherPrivilege":15,"UserInteractionRequired":15},{"Version":32,"VectorString":33,"AccessVector":22,"AccessComplexity":26,"Authentication":24,"ConfidentialityImpact":34,"IntegrityImpact":24,"AvailabilityImpact":24,"BaseScore":35,"BaseSeverity":15,"Exploitability":15,"RemediationLevel":15,"ReportConfidence":15,"TemporalScore":15,"CollateralDamagePotential":15,"TargetDistribution":15,"ConfidentialityRequirement":15,"IntegrityRequirement":15,"AvailabilityRequirement":15,"EnvironmentalScore":15},"2.0","AV:N\u002FAC:M\u002FAu:N\u002FC:P\u002FI:N\u002FA:N","PARTIAL",4.3,8.6,2.9,0.13877,[38,38,38,38,38,38,38],"Medium",[42,47,50,53,56,59,61,63],{"vendor":43,"product":44,"version":45,"criteria":46,"vulnerable":4},"citrix","application_delivery_controller_firmware","10.5","cpe:2.3:o:citrix:application_delivery_controller_firmware:10.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":43,"product":44,"version":48,"criteria":49,"vulnerable":4},"11.0","cpe:2.3:o:citrix:application_delivery_controller_firmware:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":43,"product":44,"version":51,"criteria":52,"vulnerable":4},"11.1","cpe:2.3:o:citrix:application_delivery_controller_firmware:11.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":43,"product":44,"version":54,"criteria":55,"vulnerable":4},"12.0","cpe:2.3:o:citrix:application_delivery_controller_firmware:12.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":43,"product":57,"version":45,"criteria":58,"vulnerable":4},"netscaler_gateway_firmware","cpe:2.3:o:citrix:netscaler_gateway_firmware:10.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":43,"product":57,"version":48,"criteria":60,"vulnerable":4},"cpe:2.3:o:citrix:netscaler_gateway_firmware:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":43,"product":57,"version":51,"criteria":62,"vulnerable":4},"cpe:2.3:o:citrix:netscaler_gateway_firmware:11.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",{"vendor":43,"product":57,"version":54,"criteria":64,"vulnerable":4},"cpe:2.3:o:citrix:netscaler_gateway_firmware:12.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",8,[67,73,77,81,86,91,93,95,97,99],{"url":68,"source":69,"tags":70},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securityfocus.com\u002Fbid\u002F102173","Securityfocus",[71,72],"Third Party Advisory","VDB Entry",{"url":74,"source":75,"tags":76},"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.securitytracker.com\u002Fid\u002F1039985","Securitytracker",[71,72],{"url":78,"source":79,"tags":80},"https:\u002F\u002Frobotattack.org\u002F","Robotattack",[71],{"url":82,"source":83,"tags":84},"https:\u002F\u002Fsupport.citrix.com\u002Farticle\u002Fctx230238","Citrix",[85],"Vendor Advisory",{"url":87,"source":88,"tags":89},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kb.cert.org\u002Fvuls\u002Fid\u002F144389","Cert",[71,90],"US Government Resource",{"url":68,"source":69,"tags":92},[71,72],{"url":74,"source":75,"tags":94},[71,72],{"url":78,"source":79,"tags":96},[71],{"url":82,"source":83,"tags":98},[85],{"url":87,"source":88,"tags":100},[71,90],10,[103],{"id":104,"name":105,"description":106,"extendedDescription":107,"status":108,"abstraction":109,"structure":110},"CWE-327","Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm","The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.","Cryptographic algorithms are the methods by which data is scrambled to prevent observation or influence by unauthorized actors. Insecure cryptography can be exploited to expose sensitive information, modify data in unexpected ways, spoof identities of other users or devices, or other impacts.\nIt is very difficult to produce a secure algorithm, and even high-profile algorithms by accomplished cryptographic experts have been broken. Well-known techniques exist to break or weaken various kinds of cryptography. Accordingly, there are a small number of well-understood and heavily studied algorithms that should be used by most products. Using a non-standard or known-insecure algorithm is dangerous because a determined adversary may be able to break the algorithm and compromise whatever data has been protected.\nSince the state of cryptography advances so rapidly, it is common for an algorithm to be considered \"unsafe\" even if it was once thought to be strong. This can happen when new attacks are discovered, or if computing power increases so much that the cryptographic algorithm no longer provides the amount of protection that was originally thought.\nFor a number of reasons, this weakness is even more challenging to manage with hardware deployment of cryptographic algorithms as opposed to software implementation. First, if a flaw is discovered with hardware-implemented cryptography, the flaw cannot be fixed in most cases without a recall of the product, because hardware is not easily replaceable like software. Second, because the hardware product is expected to work for years, the adversary's computing power will only increase over time.","Draft","Class","Simple",1,false,[],{"title":115,"metaDescription":116,"keywords":117,"canonicalUrl":118,"structuredData":119},"What is CVE-2017-17382? Vulnerability Analysis | Security Advisory | EdgeProtect","Comprehensive analysis of CVE-2017-17382, a medium severity cyber security vulnerability from 2017. Citrix NetScaler Application Delivery Controller (ADC) an...","CVE-2017-17382, CVE-2017-17382 vulnerability, CVE-2017-17382 security, medium severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research, vulnerability assessment, cyber threats, 2017, CVSS score, exploit, patch, remediation, citrix security, application_delivery_controller_firmware vulnerability, netscaler_gateway_firmware vulnerability","\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2017-17382",{"@context":120,"@type":121,"headline":115,"description":116,"datePublished":10,"dateModified":11,"author":122,"publisher":126,"about":130,"mainEntityOfPage":134,"articleSection":137,"keywords":138},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","TechArticle",{"@type":123,"name":124,"url":125},"Organization","EdgeProtect","https:\u002F\u002Fedgeprotect.io",{"@type":123,"name":124,"url":125,"logo":127},{"@type":128,"url":129},"ImageObject","https:\u002F\u002Fedgeprotect.io\u002Fimg\u002Flogos\u002Fedgeprotect-logo-512.png",{"@type":131,"name":6,"description":132,"additionalType":133},"Thing","Cybersecurity Vulnerability","https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org\u002FSoftwareBug",{"@type":135,"@id":136},"WebPage","https:\u002F\u002Fedgeprotect.io\u002Fwhat-is\u002Fcve-2017-17382","Cybersecurity","CVE-2017-17382, CVE-2017-17382 vulnerability, CVE-2017-17382 security, medium severity vulnerability, cybersecurity, vulnerability analysis, security advisory, CVE database, threat intelligence, security research",[140,153],{"Operator":15,"Negate":15,"Nodes":141},[142],{"Operator":143,"Negate":15,"CPEMatch":144},"OR",[145,147,149,151],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":46,"MatchCriteriaID":146,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"D56F2AAF-4658-484C-9A3A-D8A52BA5B10C",{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":49,"MatchCriteriaID":148,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"3CE459BE-DA8F-4DFB-B901-5F294C6311F7",{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":52,"MatchCriteriaID":150,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"8CE9E655-0D97-4DCF-AC2F-79DCD12770E5",{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":55,"MatchCriteriaID":152,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"49454F7D-77B5-46DF-B95C-312AF2E68EAD",{"Operator":15,"Negate":15,"Nodes":154},[155],{"Operator":143,"Negate":15,"CPEMatch":156},[157,159,161,163],{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":58,"MatchCriteriaID":158,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"7E0FA8E2-3E8F-481E-8C39-FB00A9739DFC",{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":60,"MatchCriteriaID":160,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"D2C6F82C-9969-4A6E-88C8-AB8BB0AAD3C7",{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":62,"MatchCriteriaID":162,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"A5D73B9A-59AA-4A38-AEAF-7EAB0965CD7E",{"Vulnerable":4,"Criteria":64,"MatchCriteriaID":164,"VersionStartExcluding":15,"VersionStartIncluding":15,"VersionEndExcluding":15,"VersionEndIncluding":15},"B9F3ED0E-7F3D-477B-B645-77DA5FC7F502",[],[167,174],{"id":168,"eventType":169,"eventTime":170,"details":171,"label":172,"color":173},"1cea8025-2eaa-4934-b64e-9c15906bdd5f","LOW_EPSS_DELTA","2025-07-02T04:12:08.02509+00:00","Daily EPSS score decreased by 0.127 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Decreased","green",{"id":175,"eventType":176,"eventTime":177,"details":178,"label":179,"color":180},"86a1ba25-9cff-4d88-a139-ad418eb4e2ae","HIGH_EPSS_DELTA","2025-07-05T04:06:06.838533+00:00","Daily EPSS score increased by 0.127 on 2023-12-30","EPSS Score Increased","red",{"lastModified":11,"cacheTime":182,"version":32},1793198719526,{"score":184,"band":185,"action":186,"scoredAt":187},28,"Low","Monitor","2026-10-28T06:43:00.484112+00:00"]