[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fnL2X0lYfR7h5fbgJCJqJXSQSa-qbDeXmFfb0tHC5E-I":3,"g5a-family:redhat\u002Fjboss_core_services":113,"g5a-ex:redhat\u002Fjboss_core_services@*":116},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"product":6,"versions":19,"topVulnerabilitiesByEpss":21,"kevVulnerabilities":78,"seoMetadata":91,"meta":110},{"vendorName":7,"productName":8,"versionCount":9,"totalCves":10,"kevCount":11,"lastCveUpdate":12,"versions":13,"description":18},"redhat","jboss_core_services",1,31,3,"2025-06-12",[14],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":4},"1.0",18,2,"Jboss Core Services by Redhat is a technology product with 1 tracked version and 31 known security vulnerabilities including 3 CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities. Get comprehensive security analysis, vulnerability tracking, and threat intelligence for this product.",[20],{"version":15,"cve_count":16,"kev_count":17,"has_kev":4},[22,30,36,43,48,52,56,62,66,72],{"cveId":23,"description":24,"publishedDate":25,"cvssScore":26,"cvssVersion":27,"severity":28,"isKev":4,"epssScore":29},"CVE-2023-44487","The HTTP\u002F2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.","2023-10-10",7.5,"v3.1","High",0.99999,{"cveId":31,"description":32,"publishedDate":33,"cvssScore":34,"cvssVersion":27,"severity":35,"isKev":4,"epssScore":29},"CVE-2021-40438","A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.","2021-09-16",9,"Critical",{"cveId":37,"description":38,"publishedDate":39,"cvssScore":26,"cvssVersion":40,"severity":28,"isKev":41,"epssScore":42},"CVE-2018-11759","The Apache Web Server (httpd) specific code that normalised the requested path before matching it to the URI-worker map in Apache Tomcat JK (mod_jk) Connector 1.2.0 to 1.2.44 did not handle some edge cases correctly. If only a sub-set of the URLs supported by Tomcat were exposed via httpd, then it was possible for a specially constructed request to expose application functionality through the reverse proxy that was not intended for clients accessing the application via the reverse proxy. It was also possible in some configurations for a specially constructed request to bypass the access controls configured in httpd. While there is some overlap between this issue and CVE-2018-1323, they are not identical.","2018-10-31","v3.0",false,0.90647,{"cveId":44,"description":45,"publishedDate":46,"cvssScore":26,"cvssVersion":27,"severity":28,"isKev":41,"epssScore":47},"CVE-2019-9515","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.","2019-08-13",0.87286,{"cveId":49,"description":50,"publishedDate":46,"cvssScore":26,"cvssVersion":27,"severity":28,"isKev":41,"epssScore":51},"CVE-2019-9514","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both.",0.82813,{"cveId":53,"description":54,"publishedDate":46,"cvssScore":26,"cvssVersion":27,"severity":28,"isKev":41,"epssScore":55},"CVE-2019-9513","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU.",0.81556,{"cveId":57,"description":58,"publishedDate":59,"cvssScore":60,"cvssVersion":27,"severity":28,"isKev":4,"epssScore":61},"CVE-2019-0211","In Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38, with MPM event, worker or prefork, code executing in less-privileged child processes or threads (including scripts executed by an in-process scripting interpreter) could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the parent process (usually root) by manipulating the scoreboard. Non-Unix systems are not affected.","2019-04-08",7.8,0.65005,{"cveId":63,"description":64,"publishedDate":46,"cvssScore":26,"cvssVersion":27,"severity":28,"isKev":41,"epssScore":65},"CVE-2019-9511","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.",0.59547,{"cveId":67,"description":68,"publishedDate":69,"cvssScore":70,"cvssVersion":40,"severity":35,"isKev":41,"epssScore":71},"CVE-2017-9788","In Apache httpd before 2.2.34 and 2.4.x before 2.4.27, the value placeholder in [Proxy-]Authorization headers of type 'Digest' was not initialized or reset before or between successive key=value assignments by mod_auth_digest. Providing an initial key with no '=' assignment could reflect the stale value of uninitialized pool memory used by the prior request, leading to leakage of potentially confidential information, and a segfault in other cases resulting in denial of service.","2017-07-13",9.1,0.5677,{"cveId":73,"description":74,"publishedDate":46,"cvssScore":75,"cvssVersion":27,"severity":76,"isKev":41,"epssScore":77},"CVE-2019-9516","Some HTTP\u002F2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory.",6.5,"Medium",0.56262,[79,83,87],{"cveId":23,"description":24,"publishedDate":25,"cvssScore":26,"severity":28,"isKev":4,"epssScore":29,"cisaVulnName":80,"cisaDateAdded":25,"cisaShortDescription":81,"cisaRequiredAction":82},"HTTP\u002F2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability","HTTP\u002F2 contains a rapid reset vulnerability that allows for a distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS).","Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",{"cveId":31,"description":32,"publishedDate":33,"cvssScore":34,"severity":35,"isKev":4,"epssScore":29,"cisaVulnName":84,"cisaDateAdded":85,"cisaShortDescription":32,"cisaRequiredAction":86},"Apache HTTP Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)","2021-12-01","Apply updates per vendor instructions.",{"cveId":57,"description":58,"publishedDate":59,"cvssScore":60,"severity":28,"isKev":4,"epssScore":61,"cisaVulnName":88,"cisaDateAdded":89,"cisaShortDescription":90,"cisaRequiredAction":86},"Apache HTTP Server Privilege Escalation Vulnerability","2021-11-03","Apache HTTP Server, with MPM event, worker or prefork, code executing in less-privileged child processes or threads (including scripts executed by an in-process scripting interpreter) could execute code with the privileges of the parent process (usually root) by manipulating the scoreboard.",{"title":92,"metaDescription":93,"keywords":94,"structuredData":95},"Jboss Core Services by Redhat - Security Vulnerabilities & Analysis | EdgeProtect","Comprehensive security analysis for Jboss Core Services by Redhat covering 1 version with 31 tracked vulnerabilities including 1 critical and 2 high-severity issues and 3 CISA KEV vulnerabilities. Real-time threat intelligence, CVE tracking, and security recommendations.","Jboss Core Services vulnerabilities, Jboss Core Services security, Jboss Core Services CVE, Redhat Jboss Core Services, Jboss Core Services threat intelligence, Redhat security, product security analysis, cybersecurity threats, vulnerability management, CVE tracking, Jboss Core Services KEV, Jboss Core Services exploited vulnerabilities",{"@context":96,"@type":97,"name":98,"description":93,"url":99,"manufacturer":100,"applicationCategory":104,"softwareVersion":105,"mainEntity":106},"https:\u002F\u002Fschema.org","SoftwareApplication","Jboss Core Services","https:\u002F\u002Fedgeprotect.io\u002Fvulnerabilities\u002Ftechnologies\u002Fvendors\u002Fredhat\u002Fjboss_core_services",{"@type":101,"name":102,"url":103},"Organization","Redhat","https:\u002F\u002Fedgeprotect.io\u002Fvendors\u002Fredhat","Security Software","1 versions tracked",{"@type":107,"name":108,"description":109,"vulnerabilityCount":10,"dateModified":12},"SecurityVulnerability","Jboss Core Services Security Vulnerabilities","Security vulnerabilities affecting Jboss Core Services by Redhat",{"totalVersions":9,"totalVulnerabilities":10,"kevVulnerabilities":11,"lastUpdated":12,"generatedAt":111,"apiVersion":112},"2026-10-28T14:31:36.853Z","3.0",[114],{"product":115,"cves":17},"jboss_core_services_httpd",{"rows":117,"total":11,"capped":41,"failed":130},[118,122,126],{"cveId":23,"name":80,"severity":28,"cvss":26,"added":25,"epss":29,"published":119,"ranges":120,"checked":4,"hits":121,"covers":41},"2023-10-10T14:15:10.883",[],[],{"cveId":31,"name":84,"severity":35,"cvss":34,"added":85,"epss":29,"published":123,"ranges":124,"checked":4,"hits":125,"covers":41},"2021-09-16T15:15:07.633",[15],[],{"cveId":57,"name":88,"severity":28,"cvss":60,"added":89,"epss":61,"published":127,"ranges":128,"checked":4,"hits":129,"covers":41},"2019-04-08T22:29:00.387",[15],[],0]